Understand the local context
Begin with course outcomes, enrollment patterns, and the experience of the people closest to the work. The purpose is to define the real problem before proposing a solution.
Leading academic change
Better outcomes begin with better systems.
Improving student success at scale is an organizational challenge. It requires faculty ownership, a clear academic purpose, and enough follow-through to turn an agreed-upon direction into daily practice.
Guiding principle
Every student who engages seriously in the work of learning should have a clear, rigorous, and supported pathway to success.
The framework
Use evidence to understand the system, then lead people through change.
This is not a prescribed teaching method. It is a way to help faculty examine what is happening, decide what students must learn, and build a course structure that supports that goal. The details should vary by discipline and institution.
Agree on essential learning
Faculty identify what students must know and be able to do. That shared academic purpose provides a basis for decisions about content and assessment.
Build an aligned system
Instruction, practice, assessment, course policies, and student support should reinforce one another. Faculty retain disciplinary judgment while working within a coherent design.
Stay with the implementation
Change becomes real through communication and coordination. Results are reviewed after launch, and the design is adjusted when the evidence calls for it.
Leadership case study
BIOL 1441: coordinating change at scale
Cell and Molecular Biology serves approximately 1,700 students each year across multiple sections and instructors. Improving outcomes required more than revising lessons. The faculty team needed a common understanding of the problem and a workable way to act on it together.
A gateway course with institution-wide consequences.
BIOL 1441 is an early requirement for Biology majors and students in other science-based programs. When students struggle in a course at this scale, the effects extend to persistence, degree progress, advising, and later courses.
Improvement had to extend across sections.
Individual instructors could make useful changes, but lasting improvement required faculty agreement about essential learning and greater consistency in the experience students received.
The team built a shared academic foundation.
Faculty clarified core concepts, aligned learning objectives with assessment, and redesigned the opening portion of the course. Practice and academic support became part of the required experience rather than something students had to find on their own.
Shared direction did not require identical teaching.
Instructors worked from common goals and expectations while retaining room for their own expertise. BIOL 1441 also used a unifying narrative, a course-specific choice rather than a required feature of the larger framework.
18percentage-point average improvement across targeted gateway courses
Results after redesign
Faculty-led change produced measurable improvement.
Success rates rose while academic expectations remained intact. The work also created a more coherent foundation across instructors and sections, making it easier to identify what was working and where further attention was needed.
Improvement at scaleThe gains were achieved in high-enrollment gateway courses serving students across several academic programs.
A model that transferredSimilar principles were later applied in Anatomy and Physiology, where success rates in both courses now exceed 80%.
Consulting & institutional adaptation
A framework, not a formula.
The process travels because it starts with local evidence and faculty expertise. The resulting design should reflect each institution's students, mission, resources, and academic culture.
Anatomy & Physiology
Faculty applied the same emphasis on essential learning, alignment, and embedded support without using the BIOL 1441 narrative approach. Success rates in A&P I and II now exceed 80%.
Institutional adaptation and consulting
The framework begins with local evidence and the expertise of local faculty. That makes it useful for institutions with different missions and academic cultures. My role is to help people understand their system and build an approach they can sustain.
The larger lesson
Student success is not created by lowering expectations. It is created by building a better pathway to meet them.
Evidence can show where an academic system is falling short. Faculty leadership determines whether that knowledge becomes meaningful change.
Return to homepage